The Big Bang in VGF Analysis
The known scientific facts of physics fit together to create the "Big Bang theory". However, the standard scientific theory can only work in tracing the origins of the universe back to a point just after the origin, known as the Planck Boundary. This is the point where the whole concept-structure of standard physics breaks down. This is a well recognised fact.
In the IIP-VGF framework applied to standard scientific cosmology the Planck boundary becomes the point at which spacetime appears, rather than presuming spacetime must begin at the origin, which is the unverifiable assumption made by standard science. In VGF terms, spacetime is in fact the first great permanently stable closure, in the infinite iteration, at the end of the first great stabilisation cascade of closures in the VGF. The VGF does not replace the standard science. As an analysis technique, however, it explains in consistency with the analysis why the existence scientific model fails at the Planck boundary.
In VGF analysis, going "backwards" towards the origin, beyond the Planck boundary, there is no time or space or spacetime, just as, in fact, there isn't in the actual standard theory in so far as it holds together. "Inside" the Planck boundary, in VGF terms, is iterative generativity that has not yet stabilised into the closure that is dimension and spacetime.
What physics calls "energy" can then be interpreted as a property of invariance that arises from the spacetime closure, in terms of the stability-fidelity that the analysis outlines.
The rate of expansion of the universe is then what is necessary in order for the spacetime closure to have the stability to enable ongoing reopening of closures and stabilisation cascades to continue within it.
So how is it that everything that evolves in spacetime is adapted to the expansion of spacetime, whose rate of expansion is just what is needed to allow it all to arise?
The answer is actually very simple. It is essentially a case of survival of the fittest, or natural selection, except that in this case we are not talking about species, we are talking about attractors in the attractor landscape of the VGF.
In the IIP-VGF framework applied to standard scientific cosmology the Planck boundary becomes the point at which spacetime appears, rather than presuming spacetime must begin at the origin, which is the unverifiable assumption made by standard science. In VGF terms, spacetime is in fact the first great permanently stable closure, in the infinite iteration, at the end of the first great stabilisation cascade of closures in the VGF. The VGF does not replace the standard science. As an analysis technique, however, it explains in consistency with the analysis why the existence scientific model fails at the Planck boundary.
In VGF analysis, going "backwards" towards the origin, beyond the Planck boundary, there is no time or space or spacetime, just as, in fact, there isn't in the actual standard theory in so far as it holds together. "Inside" the Planck boundary, in VGF terms, is iterative generativity that has not yet stabilised into the closure that is dimension and spacetime.
What physics calls "energy" can then be interpreted as a property of invariance that arises from the spacetime closure, in terms of the stability-fidelity that the analysis outlines.
The rate of expansion of the universe is then what is necessary in order for the spacetime closure to have the stability to enable ongoing reopening of closures and stabilisation cascades to continue within it.
So how is it that everything that evolves in spacetime is adapted to the expansion of spacetime, whose rate of expansion is just what is needed to allow it all to arise?
The answer is actually very simple. It is essentially a case of survival of the fittest, or natural selection, except that in this case we are not talking about species, we are talking about attractors in the attractor landscape of the VGF.